But if we believe that architecture serves a society as well as reflects its values, then we must provide for those with the most need and the fewest options. -Sam Davis, UC Berkeley architect.
Why do poor people live in ugly houses? The answer to this question may seem rhetorical and sound condescending. But, Architecture, or should I say
good architecture, may be defined as much by creativity, ingenuity, and empathy with the persons it is meant to live with, as with financial resources. Naivete aside (of course, many architectural masterpieces could not have been built without profuse funds), but the fundamental values of architecture would seem to be ones which could be adaptable to resource-limited environments.
Does it matter though? As it turns out, there is a fascinating relationship between
housing and health which can be thought of holistically and spacially (do I live near a toxic dump?, do I live far away from jobs?, etc.) or down to the personal level of human interacting with designed space. An interesting take on this is a relatively recent increase in interest in designing
health care facilities in ways to promote the healing process rather than make one feel deathly uncomfortable (a feeling doctors are not immune from).